Behavior is a critical issue in the implementation of Integrated Business Planning (IBP) because the success of IBP relies heavily on people and their ability to work collaboratively and align their behaviors with the goals of the process. There are several reasons why behavior can be a challenge in IBP implementation.
Firstly, IBP requires a significant shift in the way people work and think. It involves breaking down silos and encouraging cross-functional collaboration, which can be difficult in organizations where departments have historically worked independently. This requires a change in behavior at both an individual and organizational level, and this change can be difficult to achieve. In an organization with silos you may see comments centered around an us vs them mentality where both functions escape accountability. Comments you might hear from sales, “I can’t hit my revenue targets because supply chain can’t deliver and supply chain responds with “I can’t deliver because the forecast is bad.” The challenge is that in most cases there is an element of truth in both statements, but without a cross-functional collaboration this perpetual cycle will continue preventing the organization from holding anyone accountable and failing to achieve business objectives.
Secondly, IBP requires a culture of openness and transparency. It is essential that all stakeholders are honest and transparent about their plans, forecasts, and performance metrics. This can be a challenge in organizations where there is a lack of trust, or where individuals are protective of their own interests. Changing these behaviors and creating a culture of transparency can take time and effort. Often some people will prefer to delay any bad news as long as possible and prefer to hope things will improve by the end of the year. In some organizations there is a culture of showing green measures that enable the department to look good rather than drive continuous improvement. You might see organizations not following the right calculation for standard metrics, or leaving out large portions of data with seemingly logical reasons. These are all tactics to hide true performance that prevents the organization from understanding their true capability and therefore prevents them from planning effectively.
Thirdly, implementing IBP requires a significant investment of time and resources. This can be a challenge for organizations where people are already stretched thin and may not have the bandwidth to take on additional responsibilities. Additionally, some individuals may be resistant to change and may not see the value in investing their time and effort into a new process.
Finally, implementing IBP requires effective communication and leadership support. Leaders need to communicate the benefits of IBP, set clear expectations, and provide the necessary resources and support to make it successful. Without effective communication and leadership, individuals may not understand the importance of the process, or may not feel supported in their efforts to implement it. Be cautious of the “false prophecy” of leadership support, which is when leadership says all the right supportive declarations, however doesn’t fully understand how IBP will change the way they run the business and then push back on the implementation of key elements of the IBP process. This is like declaring to support all the merits of being vegan but then insisting on eating bacon and eggs for breakfast every day.
In conclusion, behavior is a critical issue in IBP implementation because the success of the process depends on people and their ability to work collaboratively, be transparent, invest time and resources, and embrace change. Overcoming these behavioral challenges requires strong leadership, effective communication, and a commitment to creating a culture of openness, transparency, and collaboration.
Thanks for reading.
